One Belt, One Road Between Three Seas: China’s Soft-power Policy Towards ‘New’ EU Members

ORCID: Bartosz Dziewiałtowski-Gintowt: 0000-0002-4546-4031

ORCID: Bartosz Dziewiałtowski-Gintowt: 0000-0002-4546-4031

Pages: 93-114

Edition: Lublin 2019


Citation method: B. Dziewiałtowski-Gintowt, One Belt, One Road Between Three Seas: China’s Soft-power Policy Towards ‘New’ EU Members, „Rocznik Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej” 17 (2019), z. 3, s. 93-114, DOI: 10.36874/RIESW.2019.3.6

Keywords: , , , ,

Abstract: China’s soft-power practice in its international activity boils down to four areas: culture, education, diplomacy, and economy. The most important element of China’s soft-power policy seems to be the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Announced in 2013, the BRI is a complex, long-term and large-scale strategic political and economic project by the Chinese government with an infrastructure character. In this way, China is seeking to invest its capital surpluses in resurrecting the ancient Silk Road to create railroad and maritime networks with its most important trading partner – the European Union. In these circumstances, in September 2015, the presidents of Central and Eastern EU member states announced the establishment of the separate Three Seas Initiative (TSI), a political and economic project bringing together 12 EU states, including 11 ‘new’ members and Austria. These entities constitute an informal bloc of states between the Adriatic, Baltic and Black seas, though without a permanent secretariat but with rotating leadership. In addition to the lack of a formal structure, the TSI region, located mainly in the EU’s eastern part, is characterized by a weaker infrastructure network than Western Europe, lower GDP (except Austria), and high dependence on gas supplies from Russia (except Croatia). To overcome these disparities, the TSI has developed a catalogue of 48 investment priorities in three economic areas: energy, transport, and digitalisation. China’s soft-power policy towards the ‘new’ EU members may be decided by the American patronage of the TSI and the fact that one of the flagship projects is the North-South Gas Corridor, which will enable the sale of American LNG in Central Europe, which has been dependent on gas supplies from Russia, China’s partner in the BRI. In the context of the US-China trade war, White House planners recognise Central Europe as both a peripheral and key area for their policy and seek to strengthen the Three Seas project, which may lead to limiting areas of cooperation under the ‘17+1’ format, involving CEE countries and China. On the other hand, the development of better energy, transport and digital connections in the EU’s east clearly intersects with China’s idea of building a New Eurasian Land Bridge under the BRI to connect the most economically developed edges of Eurasia. The new U.S. strategy towards the countries of the CEE seems to boil down to involvement in specific energy-related projects. Instead of blocking or diminishing BRI-related infrastructure projects in China, they seem in fact to complement the Chinese activity in the CEE. Increased investment by American enterprises in the region may allow the administration in Washington to maintain control of Chinese infrastructure investments, and the US involvement may even lead to the participation of American companies in projects originally started by Beijing.


‘Austria warns about China’s rising influence in Europe’, Japanese Nikkei Asian Review, about-China-s-rising-influence-in-Europe [2019-10-02].

‘EU sets collision course with China over ‚Silk Road’ rail project Belgrade- Budapest’, Financial Times, 11e6-95ee-f14e55513608 [2019-10-02].

‘Speech of Robert M. Gates, U.S. Secretary of Defense at the Kansas State Uni- versity’, 26 November 2007, [2019-09- 19].

Bartosiak J., Rzeczpospolita między Lądem a Morzem. O wojnie i pokoju, Warsaw: Zona Zero, 2018.

Dorota R., ‘Europe centrale: l’Initiative des Trois mers’, Politique Étrangère, vol. 83, no. 2, 2018.

Góralczyk B., Wielki Renesans. Chińska transformacja i jej konsekwencje, Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Akademickie „Dialog”, 2018.

Górski J., ‘China’s Strategy towards Central and Eastern Europe Within the Framework of 16+1 Group: The Case of Poland’, in: W. Zhang, I. Alon, Ch. Lattemann, (ed.), China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Changing the Rules of Globalization, Springer, 2018.

Jinping X., The Governance of China, Beijing: Foreign Languages Press, 2014. Kościelniak C., ‘Szkolnictwo wyższe i dyplomacja naukowa jako narzędzie soft power w polityce ChRL wobec Unii Europejskiej’, Przegląd Politologiczny, no. 1, 2018.

Kowal P., Orzelska-Stączek A., Inicjatywa Trójmorza: geneza, cele i funkcjonowanie, Warsaw: Instytut Studiów Politycznych Polskiej Akademii Nauk, 2019.

Mierzejewski D. et al., Aktywność gospodarcza i polityczna Chińskiej Republiki Ludowej w regionie Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej. Raport Ośrodka Spraw Azjatyckich, Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, 2018.

Nye J., ‘China’s Soft Power Deficit To catch up, its politics must unleash the many talents of its civil society’, The Wall Street Journal, 8 May 2012.

Nye J., Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power, London: Basic Books, 1990.

Nye J., Soft Power. Jak osiągnąć sukces w polityce światowej, Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne, 2007.

Pavlićević D., ‘A Power Shift Underway in Europe? China’s Relationship with Central and Eastern Europe Under the Belt and Road Initiative’, in: L. Xing (ed.), Mapping China’s ‘One Belt One Road’ Initiative, Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.

Selim I. et al., The emergence of a European project. Three Summits for the Three Seas Initiative, Warsaw-București: OSW and New Strategy Center, 2018.

Shambaugh D., ‘China’s Soft-Power push. The Search for Respect’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 94, no. 4, 2016.

The Official Announcement from the Website of the Bank Gospodarst- wa Krajowego (Domestic Holding Bank), fundusz-trojmorza-oficjalnie-zalozony-bgk-podpisal-akt-zalozycielski [2019-10-02].

The Official Website of 17+1 Initiative, ‘Riga Declaration’, http://www.china- [2019-09-25].

The Official Website of Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, https://www. [2019- 09-29].

The Official Website of China’s National Development and Reform Com- mission, ‘Vision and Actions on Jointly Building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st Century Maritime Silk Road’, lease/201503/t20150330_669367.html [2019-09-29].

The Official Website of Confucius Institute Headquarters Hanban, http:// [2019-09-15].

The Official Website of European Commission, ‘Imports, exports and trade balance in goods between the EU and China, 2008-2018’, https://ec.europa. eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=China-EU_internation- al_trade_in_goods_statistics#EU_and_China_in_world_trade_in_goods [2019-09-20].

The Official Website of the 17+1 Initiative, [2019-09-19].

The Official Website of the Fourth Summit of the Three Seas Initiative, ‘Joint Declaration of the Fourth Summit of the Three Seas Initiative’, 5-6 June 2019, , [2019-07-30].

The Official Website of the Polish General Directorate for National Roads and Highways, na-ostatni-odcinek-drogi-ekspresowej-S14 [2019-10-02].

The Official Website of the Polish Property News Service, https://www.prop- tral-european-logistics-hub,74940.html [2019-09-29].

The Official Website of the Reuters Information Agency, ‘Croatia’s troubled Pula shipyard placed into bankruptcy’, croatia-shipbuilding/croatias-troubled-pula-shipyard-placed-into-bank- ruptcy-idUSL5N22P1Y6 [2019-10-02].

The Official Website of the Three Seas Initiative, ‘Joint Declaration of the Third Summit of the Three Seas Initiative’, 17-18 September 2018, http:// JOINT-DECLARATION.pdf [2019-07-30].

The Official Website of the Three Seas Initiative, ‘The Joint Statement on The Three Seas Initiative (The Dubrovnik Statement)’, wp-content/uploads/2018/06/DUBROVNIK.pdf [2019-07-30].

The Official Website of the Three Seas Initiative, ‘The Second Summit of the 3SeasInitiativeJointDeclaration’,6-7July2017, content/uploads/2018/06/WARSAW.pdf [2019-07-07].

The Official Website of the Three Seas Initiative, ‘The Three Seas Initia- tive Priority Interconnection Projects’, uploads/2018/09/LIST-OF-PRIORITY-INTERCONNECTION-PRO- JECTS-2018.pdf [2019-09-30].

The Official Website of the Three Seas Initiative, [2019-09-30].

The Official Website of the University Alliance of the New Silk Road http:// [2019-10-02].

The Official Website of the Xinhua News Agency, ‘New Silk Road brings more than trade to China, Europe’, 08/18/c_137399857.htm [2019-09-29].

The Official Website of the Xinhua News Agency, Jinping X., Work Togeth- er to Build the Silk Road Economic Belt and The 21st Century Maritime Silk Road, htm [2019-09-29].

Wiśniewski B. et al., ‘Trójmorze – nowy instrument w polskiej polityce za- granicznej’, Polski Przegląd Dyplomatyczny, vol. 71, no. 4, 2017.

Zbińkowski G., ‘The Three Seas Initiative and its Economic and Geopolitical Effect on the European Union and Central and Eastern Europe’, Compara- tive Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, vol. 2, no. 22, 2019.