Recognition of Kosovo: limitations of the GDR model

Uznanie Kosowa: ograniczenia modelu NRD

Abstrakt: Rosyjska inwazja na pełną skalę na Ukrainę w 2022 r. doprowadziła do ponownej oceny systemu stosunków międzynarodowych przez różnych aktorów międzynarodowych, od Chin po Unię Europejską (UE). Dla UE ponowna ocena oznaczała m.in. zwiększenie priorytetu integracji unijnej państw Bałkanów Zachodnich. Jednym z warunków pełnej integracji UE Bałkanów Zachodnich jest normalizacja stosunków między Serbią a Kosowem.
Znaczenie takiej normalizacji przypomina znaczenie nawiązania stosunków między RFN a NRD, w szczególności Układu z 1972 r., dla bezpieczeństwa i stabilności w Europie w okresie odprężenia (model NRD). Biorąc pod uwagę pragmatyczne, ale powściągliwe podejście zastosowane w Układzie z 1972 r., nie było zaskoczeniem, że przy opracowywaniu Porozumienia w sprawie drogi do normalizacji między Kosowem a Serbią wykorzystano postanowienia Układu. Istnieje jednak wiele istotnych różnic między obiema sytuacjami, a pełne zrozumienie tych różnic jest kluczowe dla wdrożenia modelu NRD w normalizacji stosunków Serbia–Kosowo. W artykule porównano i przeanalizowano niektóre czynniki polityczne, ekonomiczne, religijne i prawne, odróżniające sytuację RFN–NRD od sytuacji Serbia–Kosowo. Tym samym zostaną określone ograniczenia modelu NRD stosowanego w normalizacji Serbia–Kosowo. Takie określenie będzie przydatne przy projektowaniu przyszłych kroków w normalizacji Serbia–Kosowo.

Bibliografia:

1. Adamczyk A., Karadzoski M. A Challenge for the EU Enlargement Process in the Balkans–The Case of North Macedonia, [in:] E. Latoszek et al. (eds.), Reshaping the European Union Internally and Externally – A New Matrix? Warsaw 2019, pp. 101–115.
2. Atzili B., Kantel A., Accepting the unacceptable: Lessons from West Germany’s changing border politics, “International Studies Review” 2015, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 588–616.
3. Babić M., Rosja na Bałkanach Zachodnich. Interesy narodowe i wpływy polityczne, Zakład Europejskich Studiów Subregionalnych, Instytut Europeistyki WDiNP, 2014.
4. Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany (23 May 1949), https://www.cvce.eu/content/publication/1999/1/1/7fa618bb-604e-4980-b667-76bf0cd0dd9b/publishable_en.pdf.
5. Belgrade-Pristina Dialogue: Agreement on the path to normalisation between Kosovo and Serbia, EEAS, https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/belgrade-pristina-dialogue-agreement-path-normalisation-between-kosovo-and-serbia_en.
6. Belgrade-Pristina Dialogue: Implementation Annex to the Agreement on the Path to Normalisation of Relations between Kosovo and Serbia, EEAS, https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/belgrade-pristina-dialogue-implementation-annex-agreement-path-normalisation-relations-between_en.
7. Belgrade-Pristina Dialogue: Statement by the High Representative on the anniversary of the Agreement on the Path to Normalisation and its Implementation Annex, EEAS, https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/belgrade-pristina-dialogue-statement-high-representative-anniversary-agreement-path-normalisation_en.
8. Bieber F., Nationalist Mobilization and Stories of Serb Suffering: The Kosovo myth from 600th anniversary to the present, “Rethinking History” 2002, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 95–110.
9. Bieber F., The Serbia-Kosovo Agreements: An EU Success Story?, “Review of Central and East European Law” 2015, vol. 40, no. 3–4, pp. 285–319.
10. Brussels Agreement, https://www.srbija.gov.rs/specijal/en/120394.
11. Canveren Ö., Aknur M., European Union Agenda in Serbia’s Party Politics: A Clash Between Rationality and Identity Politics, 2020.
12. Change through Rapprochement, https://ghdi.ghi-dc.org/sub_document.cfm?document_id=81.
13. China and its impact on the EU accession process of Serbia, Strategic analysis, https://www.strategicanalysis.sk/china-and-its-impact-on-the-eu-accession-process-of-serbia/.
14. China, Serbia chart “shared future” as Xi Jinping visits Europe, Reuters, https://www.reuters.com/world/chinas-xi-jinping-visit-serbia-anniversary-1999-nato-bombing-2024-05-07/.
15. Chińczycy budują w Serbii fabrykę, w której w nieludzkich warunkach pracują Wietnamczycy, Dziennik.pl, https://gospodarka.dziennik.pl/news/artykuly/8296046,serbia-chinczycy-fabryka-wietnamczycy-nieludzkie-warunki-shandong-linglong-tire-co.html.
16. Constitution of the Republic of Serbia, http://www.parlament.gov.rs/upload/documents/Constitution_%20of_Serbia_pdf.pdf.
17. EUR-Lex – 52023SC0695 – EN, EUR-Lex, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52023SC0695.
18. For first time, a majority of Serbs are against joining the EU – poll, Euronews, https://www.euronews.com/2022/04/22/for-first-time-a-majority-of-serbs-are–against-joining-the-eu-poll.
19. Hornat J., Csicsmann L., Starzyk-Sulejewska J., The Political Elite’s Thematic Framing of China in Recent Central European Elections, “Issues and Studies” 2023, vol. 59, no. 1.
20. Koskenniemi M., International Court of Justice: Order Discontinuing the Proceedings in Case concerning Passage Through the Great Belt (Finland v. Denmark), “International Legal Materials” 1993, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 101–105.
21. Kosovo not a Priority for Most Serbs, Balkan Insight, https://balkaninsight.com/2018/04/19/serbs-choose-eu-over-kosovo-survey-04-19-2018/.109
22. Legal Status of Eastern Greenland Case (Denmark v. Norway): International Case Law, Court Opinions & Decisions, Justia, https://law.justia.com/cases/foreign/international/1933-pcij-series-a-b-no-53.html.
23. Memorandum for President Nixon from Kissinger, “Brandt’s Eastern Policy”, Wilson Center Digital Archive, https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/memorandum-president-nixon-kissinger-brandts-eastern-policy.
24. Moreton E., All Quiet on the German Front? Germany in the Post-Detente Era, “Government and Opposition” vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 438–450.
25. Nagle J., The National Democratic Party: Right Radicalism in the Federal Republic of Germany, Univ of California Press, 1970.
26. Nastić M., Constitutional Review of International Agreements from Comparative Perspective, “FACTA UNIVERSITATIS – Law and Politics” 2015, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 59–72.
27. Orlow D., West German Parties since 1945: Continuity and Change, “Central European History” vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 188–201.
28. PACE recommends that Kosovo* becomes a member of the Council of Europe, https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/-/pace-recommends-that-kosovo*-becomes-a-member-of-the-council-of-europe.
29. Papic T., De-Recognition of States: The Case of Kosovo, “Cornell International Law Journal” vol. 53, pp. 683–728.
30. Pappas T.S., Shared culture, individual strategy and collective action: explaining Slobodan Milošević’s charismatic rise to power, “Southeast European and Black Sea Studies” 2005, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 191–211.
31. Podraza A., Stępniewski T., Międzynarodowa pozycja Unii Europejskiej w warunkach niestabilności południowego i wschodniego sąsiedztwa, “Rocznik Integracji Europejskiej” 2017, no. 11, pp. 89–102.
32. Reka A., Energy and Regional Geopolitics in the Western Balkans and Eastern Mediterranean, [in:] H. Gardner (ed.), Geopolitical Turmoil in the Balkans and Eastern Mediterranean, 2023, pp. 185–204.
33. Russia signs Serbia, wins “pipeline war” with EU, Reuters, https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL25151424/.
34. Serbia before early parliamentary elections, Casimir Pulaski Foundation, https://pulaski.pl/en/serbia-before-early-parliamentary-elections/.
35. Serbia, Kosovo ‘gentlemen’s agreement’ on EU-backed deal unpacked, Euractiv, https://www.euractiv.com/section/enlargement-neighbourhood/news/serbia-kosovo-gentlemens-agreement-on-eu-backed-deal-unpacked/.
36. Serbian president’s praise of Milosevic seen by neighbouring states as a provocation, https://www.latimes.com/world/europe/la-fg-serbia-president-vucic-20180910-story.html.
37. Simma B., Legal Aspects of East-West German Relations, “Maryland Journal of International Law and Trade” 1985, vol. 9, pp. 97–115.
38. The situation in Serbia following the 2023 elections, Think Tank, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/pl/document/EPRS_ATA(2024)757638.
39. Spasojević D., Stojiljković Z., The presidentialisation of political parties in Serbia: Influence of directly elected president, [in:] G. Passarelli, The Presidentialisation of Political Parties in the Western Balkans, 2018.
40. Stępniewski T., Russia in Global Politics in the Context of the Western Balkans, “Rocznik Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej” 2015, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 47–59.
41. Texts adopted – Forced labour in the Linglong factory and environmental protests in Serbia – Thursday, 16 December 2021, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0511_EN.html.
42. Texts adopted – Recent developments in the Serbia-Kosovo dialogue, including the situation in the northern municipalities in Kosovo – Thursday, 19 October 2023, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2023-0372_EN.html.
43. The Basic Treaty (21 December 1972), https://www.cvce.eu/content/publication/1999/1/1/3b9b9f0d-6910-4ca9-8b12-accfcb91d28e/publishable_en.pdf.
44. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf.
45. Vucic Says Serbia Secures Gas Deal With Russia Following Phone Talks With Putin, https://www.rferl.org/a/serbia-vucic-gas-deal-russia/31873908.html.
46. Waardenburg J., Politics and Religion in the Balkans, “Islamic Studies” 1997, vol. 36, no. 2/3, pp. 383–402.
47. Why the green light for Kosovo joining the Council of Europe is likely to be delayed, Euronews, https://www.euronews.com/2024/05/09/why-the-green-light-for-kosovo-joining-the-council-of-europe-is-likely-to-be-delayed.

PDF: Pobierz